How Princeton eviscerated its free speech rule and covered it up
by Stuart Taylor Jr. and Edward Yingling
In a March 5, 2022, article titled "How Princeton Eviscerated Its Free Speech Rule and Covered It Up," published in RealClearPolitics, authors Stuart Taylor Jr. and Edward Yingling critique Princeton University's handling of free speech policies, particularly in relation to Professor Joshua Katz.
Background on Professor Joshua Katz
In July 2020, Professor Katz authored an article that included provocative language, leading to significant controversy on campus. This incident became a focal point in discussions about free speech and academic freedom at Princeton.
Administrative Actions and Policy Interpretations
The authors argue that Princeton's administration responded to the controversy by effectively undermining its own free speech policies. They suggest that the university's actions were aimed at suppressing dissenting viewpoints, thereby compromising the institution's commitment to free expression.
Implications for Free Speech at Princeton
Taylor and Yingling contend that these administrative maneuvers not only targeted Professor Katz but also set a concerning precedent for the treatment of free speech on campus. They assert that the university's approach may deter faculty and students from engaging in open discourse, fearing administrative repercussions.
Conclusion
The article calls for greater transparency and adherence to free speech principles within academic institutions. The authors emphasize the need for universities like Princeton to uphold their stated commitments to free expression, ensuring that diverse viewpoints can be shared without fear of institutional censorship.